|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
   |
Posted - 2008.04.27 13:40:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Ringo Jeicha on 27/04/2008 13:41:18
 Quote:
Lol! You guys better pray that any changes made are made from arguments made by PvPers, or you guys are screwed too. This is a direct challenge on war by carebears, put simply. If local is removed and something put in its place that doesn't atleast do the job as well as local, then war is over.
No, war will be more difficult than learning a monkey to do f1-f8.
|
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.27 13:45:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kale Kold
Originally by: Ringo Jeicha
No, war will be more difficult than learning a monkey to do f1-f8.
Nice carebear quote again. Coming straight from SWA!
And again you seem to fail in understanding the concept of alts.
|
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.27 13:46:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kale Kold
Originally by: Ringo Jeicha
You were owned once by looking at an alts bio and concluding he/she/it is a carebear, now stfu, carebear.
In real-life, will the invading country tell the invaded country with how many men and equipment they will come?
Post with your mains you cowards!
...plus Intel will provide that info and btw EVE != RL! 
Too bad it isnt, it would have scared you to ever join eve in the first place 
|
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.27 13:46:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Kale Kold
Originally by: Ringo Jeicha
Originally by: Kale Kold
Originally by: Ringo Jeicha
No, war will be more difficult than learning a monkey to do f1-f8.
Nice carebear quote again. Coming straight from SWA!
And again you seem to fail in understanding the concept of alts.
And again you fail to understand the concept of coward!
Pff you fail
|
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.27 13:50:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Ringo Jeicha on 27/04/2008 13:54:12
Edited by: Ringo Jeicha on 27/04/2008 13:52:16
Edited by: Ringo Jeicha on 27/04/2008 13:51:46
Edited by: Ringo Jeicha on 27/04/2008 13:51:02
Originally by: Kale Kold
Edited by: Kale Kold on 27/04/2008 13:48:06
Originally by: Ringo Jeicha
You fail!
Why the need to go personal?
ad hominem
and post with ur main!
I simply refuse to see the need! So you can wardec my corp who has really nothing to do with my opinion? How lame can one get, and yes i am getting personal now 
And in any case, a discussion works simple, you make a statement, and you provide proof. So far I haven't seen any elegible proof besides a whine that it will cost you time.
I do however support the need of an active radar, which is directly dependent of the ship's sensor strenght
|
Ringo Jeicha
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.04.27 18:02:00 -
[6]
Ad hominem: It is most commonly used to refer specifically to the ad hominem abusive, or argumentum ad personam, which consists of criticizing or personally attacking an argument's proponent in an attempt to discredit that argument. It is also used when an opponent is unable to find fault with an argument, yet for various reasons, the opponent disagrees with it.
With other words, every time he said that, he couldnt find anything to back it up. Sort of a geeky did to, did not.
|
|
|
| |
|